![Kick's Controversial Content: What Adin Ross and IShowSpeed Bring to the Platform](http://fanarch.com/cdn/shop/articles/FOR_ARTICLES_29_a4c17bb1-a41c-4421-a372-0045e6fdb805_1100x.png?v=1724076803)
Kick's Controversial Content: What Adin Ross and IShowSpeed Bring to the Platform
Kick's Controversial Content: What Adin Ross and ISho...
By Edcel Panganiban August 20, 2024 01:38
With the advent of streaming platforms, online entertainment has seen a major shift, and Kick is one to watch as it goes up against giants like Twitch. Some of the biggest names on Kick include Adin Ross and IShowSpeed, who have built up huge audiences thanks to their spicy streams along with being controversial online personalities. In this article, learn all about who these streamers are and what they do, as well as the controversies that came with them streaming on Kick and how it affects both Kickstreaming platforms.
Context on Adin Ross and IShowSpeed
Adin Ross is a 22-year-old YouTuber famous for his infectious personality, mostly playing video games and engaging with an audience in chat. Vuitton first found success on Twitch, where he quickly grew a loyal audience until the streaming platform banned him for reportedly breaking community rules. Ross's shift to Kick has allowed him to keep being Ross, and this usually doesn't bode well within the traditional behavior you find in most streaming platforms.
A 19-year-old YouTuber and streamer named IShowSpeed, real name Darren Watkins Jr., has typically gained all his fame from videos about how energetic he can be. Still, he is a fun little bag of comedic shenanigans. He is known for his eccentric live streaming on YouTube, featuring comedy, gaming, and music show casting contests. This later caught up with Speed as he was temporarily banned by platforms like YouTube for his dangerous conduct while streaming live.
Ross and Speed have amassed large online fan bases, with millions of subscribers to their YouTube channels, where they share prolific, often wild-sounding content. This serves as a reminder of how much the landscape has changed in online entertainment, where what plays well largely comes down to getting viewers emotional and keeping them engaged rather than upholding traditional standards for content.
Content types and controversial behavior
Adin Ross and IShowSpeed's content has a unique way of being there to provoke, making humor with stuff many find alien or disgusting.
Adin Ross
The streams with Ross include:
Gambling: He has streamed himself playing online casino games, leading to accusations of promoting gambling to his younger viewers. Critics have pointed to his lack of respect for copyright law regarding live-streaming copyrighted events, including boxing matches.
Poor Taste in Humor: Ross loves to banter, and much of it is laced with crude humor. His navy mixed in controversial guests such as Andrew Tate representing the blue pills. Consequently, he has been accused of legitimizing dangerous beliefs among his followers.
Dangerous Stunt Streams: His streams have also featured borderline dangerous stunts, which has led to concerns about the level of influence he may possess over his impressionable fanbase.
IShowSpeed
Similarly controversial, the content of Speed includes:
Risk-Taking Challenges: Some have banned him, like jumping over moving cars in live streams. These actions are not only endangering his life but also sending a terrible message to the younger viewers.
Inconsistent Behavior: Speed's erratic pursuits, which can range from spurts of explosive behavior to tense/incessant arguments with fans and other streamers, result in some chaos that is either fun or carefree, depending on the individual.
Language: Known for his streams filled with swearing and insults, many viewers and critics have called him out on cussing, etc., especially while so many young children watch these, too.
Effect on Kick Platform & Community
For Kick, the entry of Adin Ross and IShowSpeed on its platform represents a critical moment in recent history for that community and what is happening online generally.
Community Dynamics
Appealing to Viewers: Surely, the sometimes controversial content produced by Ross and Speed has helped so many eyeballs land on Kick in its rise from a standing start. Many times, hundreds of thousands will show up to their streams, calling it a lively community with passionate comments.
A Slippery Slope: Allowing this type of material on Kick could normalize streamers' extreme behavior to increase viewership, making shock value an even higher determining factor than it already is. If other workers see this pattern taking hold, it could motivate an increase in that kind of content while at the same time continuing to burnish Discord's reputation as a platform with many "murky" channels.
Broader Online Landscape
Influence over Young Audiences—Because both streamers have such large followings of young viewers, whatever they do or say can largely affect their audience spirit. This, in turn, sheds light on ethical dilemmas about the role of content creators in creating moral and social standards.
Sep 24 PM PT Industry Response: The emergence of Ross, Speed, and others has encouraged conversations throughout the streaming industry about content moderation and platforms' obligations to safeguard their audience from harmful content.
What Moderation Means for Kick
Critics Call for Guidelines: Kick must issue clear community rules preventing harmful content from spreading. By interacting with Kickstarter, you agree to follow the Community Guidelines resurgence. The failure of moderation has already resulted in events that could pose potential legal and ethical risks to the platform.
Finding the Right Balance: Kick is challenged with balancing an environment of free expression that attracts creators while keeping viewers in a safe, non-hostile space, especially because so many younger people are on the platform.
Stakeholder views
Fans: The two owe their die-hards to providing raw content that sets it apart from cleaner stuff on pretty much every other platform. That is a key aspect of their streaming value, they claim; said spontaneity and thus less controlled nature make watching them the entertainment spectacle that it has apparently become.
Critics: On the opposite end, critics often point out how difficult their content is and unsuitable for younger audiences. The problem, they argue, is that getting reckless with language and behavior can have a long-term impact on societal norms and individual actions.
What Industry Experts Say: According to digital media and content moderation experts, platforms like Kick should enforce more preemptive responsibility for monitoring their in-platform material. Without oversight, they say the platform could become a launching pad for toxic and harmful behavior and ideas.
The ability of content creators to draw in masses with controversial material, thinking about both the duties of those making online videos and services encouraging them, is a thought to consider. With Kick, as the platform expands, it grapples with content moderation in a flooded sea of creators, maintaining an ecosystem that safeguards genuine creator and storyteller behavior. Regarding the future of Kick and online streaming generally, whether it will succeed without monetization remains to be seen. Still, competition is simply too fierce for such an expensive experiment.
LATEST
- NEWS
- |
- ARTICLES
- |
- VIDEOS