Current Legal Status of Sports Betting in Washington State and DC

By Indra Gunawan June 09, 2025 11:53

The face of sports wagering laws throughout the United States has drastically changed since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned PASPA in 2018. This pivotal event literally flooded the states with the ability to construct applicable laws regarding sports betting. Two very interesting case studies as to how different jurisdictions have managed this new revenue stream and entertainment are Washington State and the District of Columbia.

A Tale of Two Jurisdictions

While there have been a number of legislative stumbles en route there has been much that has been done towards achieving the legalization of sports betting. Washington has always had tight anti-gambling legislation, and all forms of gambling were illegal off reservations outside tribal casinos. However, then in the month of March 2020 there was a change of fortune after the signing of the bill, by Governor Jay Inslee to allow sports betting in the tribal gaming facilities of the; state.

This well worked out compromise recognized tribal sovereignty while proactively addressing gaming opportunities. Enthusiasts of sports betters had some way to feel optimism; though, the rollout will be slow because every individual tribal compact had to be negotiated with and approved.

On the other hand, the District of Columbia prevailed upon a totally different model of implementation. The even capital of the nation facilitated the entry into sports betting only at the onset of 2019 with the government monopoly model and the invitation of limited private operations in specified areas through the DC Lottery’s GambetDC platform.

This mixed method was adopted in the hope that it will support maximizing the districts revenue and creating a place for gaming entities to be part. Consequently, the outcome has been rather mixed with them at best hand with GambetDC platform for the uncompetitive odds, and also for the honey pot of the hype of the users being cowed down by the technical issues.

Current Operations and Limitations

In Washington State currently sports betting can be done from the tribal casinos only, not this to those on outside tribal lands. This arrangement is one that inheres the paranoia of the state, and adherence to the tribal state gaming compacts. Dozens of tribes are offered sports wagering today in their facility and the Snoqualmie, Tulalip and the Spokane tribes are among the first to go live. The betting experience is varied because it is bet at different places. Some of the facilities are full sport’s book environment while others are tame service.

This is huge task for Washington people when we relate to the states which have mobile capacity we must be physically in the tribal casino to make legal sports wagering. For example a Seattle resident has to move to the closest participating tribal property instead of making bets in his or her sitting room. This disadvantage definitely lowers participation and its collection, but it corresponds to the states classical conservative stance in regards to spreading gambling.

The district of Columbia is the one that provides a completely different picture. There are both residents and tourist through gambling generated from the GambetDC mobile app can bet across the district limits just like the private operators; BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook, which in a region surrounding the material area; the Capital One Arena and Nationals Park. This results in a hodgepodge of decisions in which depending on the physical location where your position from the area that you are drawn at, what you are able to access from the betting platforms changes and a veritably and enormously complicated system that both users of the system and the observers of it in the industry routinely criticise.

Revenue Realities and Future Outlook

Neither jurisdiction has seen the optimistic revenues estimates that were available on legalization. Washington’s tribal-only model shrinks the tax base, and DC’s GambetDC has always under performed to expectations. The district’s Office of Lottery and Gaming estimated annual sports betting revenue at roughly $26.8 million for fiscal year 2023-24, far off from the originally higher expectations of nearly double that figure.

Looking to the future, both jurisdictions are under strain to place their regulatory frameworks under evolution. Bills are presented in Congress at various points to extend the choices for betting undertaken outside of tribal facilities, despite the lack of success to date in achievement of satisfactory levels of support. The state’s potent tribal gaming interests have plenty of sway in Olympia, and thus, radical policy changes are not coming any time soon.

While DC continues to perfect its odd model, some council members have lobbied for a more competitive marketplace that will benefit customers and district income. The adjacent success of Virginia and Maryland’s mobile betting launches have generated significant “border bleed” cases, in which DC residents frequently cross borders to access better betting options.

In the End

The juxtaposed attitudes of Washington State and District of Columbia provide an example of complex issues that jurisdictions have to address for the sports betting regulation. Each model captures the local political realities, historical context and conflicting priorities of generation of revenue, consumer protection and respect for existing stakeholder relationships. As the national sports betting marketplace ages, both jurisdictions are likely to continue fine tuning their frameworks in reaction to consumer behavior, technologies and competitive solicitation from neighboring jurisdictions with more robust offerings.

For residents and visitors of these areas, knowledge of these different regulatory environments is still crucial for legal “participation” in an activity that still undergoes its change from prohibition to a well-accepted entertainment choice all over America.